109 - A call for increased consideration of genetic diversity in IUCN planning and actions

109 - A call for increased consideration of genetic diversity in IUCN planning and actions

Latest version in this language: Version for electronic vote | Published on: 01 Sep 2020

RECOGNISING the importance of maintaining genetic diversity – that is, variation within species – as one of the three biological diversity components, as described in the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), further specified in CBD Aichi Biodiversity Target 13 for 2020, and highlighted in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework;

HIGHLIGHTING in particular emphasis in Aichi Biodiversity Target 13 on conserving genetic diversity for wild and domesticated species by including those of cultural and social or economic importance;

NOTING that genetic diversity is a critical resource for nature and society, that many species have documented pharmaceutical, industrial, ecosystem-service or cultural values (e.g. more than 28,000 medicinal plant species), and that abundant scientific evidence demonstrates the significant role of genetic diversity in wild species for ecosystem resilience, species survival, and adaptation, especially under increased threats of climate change and new pests and diseases;

NOTING that measuring and monitoring genetic diversity, using genetic markers and demographic data, enables us to better evaluate species health, including effective population size, population viability, adaptive variation, and inbreeding, and that the exchange of genetic variation across different populations (gene flow) improves the management of biodiversity and natural resources;

RECOGNISING that loss of genetic variation, like loss of species, is permanent;

FURTHER RECOGNISING that genetic diversity assessment can be a useful indicator of changes in species populations, as it may display evolutionary changes at a more sensitive level than species indicators;

NOTING that scientists have assessed genetic diversity for thousands of species over four decades, that genetic diversity is eroding from habitat and population loss, direct harvest, disease and increasing extreme events, and that genetic diversity is inadequately safeguarded both in situ and ex situ; and

ACKNOWLEDGING the role of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group, and the SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group, as well as other groups of experts, such as the Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) Genetic Composition Working Group, the Society for Conservation Biology Conservation Genetics Working Group, and European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action on Genetic Biodiversity Knowledge for Ecosystem Services, in providing expertise on maintaining genetic diversity and integrating genetic diversity actions into conservation planning;

The IUCN World Conservation Congress, at its session in Marseille, France:

1. CALLS ON IUCN to integrate natural genetic diversity into all relevant activities beyond 2020 with explicit strategic plans, recognising genetic diversity as a crucial pillar of biodiversity, key to resilient ecosystems and society, and to preventing species extinctions, and thus contributing to maintaining all other levels of biodiversity, and underpinning the CBD and biodiversity-relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs);

2. ENCOURAGES that consideration of genetic diversity should be incorporated, where possible, into protected area planning, ex situ conservation, species conservation, reintroduction and restoration initiatives, natural capital assessments, and biodiversity monitoring using appropriate tools, indicators and databases; and

3. URGES that fair and collaborative research and relevant genetic analysis for non-commercial biodiversity management and safeguarding should be acknowledged and facilitated across nations to ensure that critical scientific and conservation advances can be generated and shared without impediment of inappropriate application of the CBD Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (2010); and

4. FURTHER URGES the prioritisation and promotion of collaborative research into the development of an index that (optimally) describes the genomic health of a population/species, and the subsequent application of this index.

We welcome inclusion of genetic diversity as one of three central elements of biodiversity in the CBD framework since its inception in 1992.
Support the CBD emphasis on conserving genetic diversity of multiple kinds of species including those of cultural, economic, or ecological importance, as currently summarized in Target 13 language “other socioeconomically and culturally valuable species”, noting that a large fraction of all species have documented pharmaceutical, industrial, ecosystem service or cultural values (e.g. more than 28,000 medicinal plant species).

We also make the following statements regarding current genetic knowledge:
Genetic diversity is a critical resource for society and nature. Genetic diversity is a nature-based solution to many modern challenges. There is abundant scientific evidence for the large role of genetic diversity for ecosystem resilience, species survival, and adaptation, especially under increased threats of climate change and new pests and disease. Likewise, there are many examples of catastrophic loss to societies and economies caused by over-reliance on narrow genetic stocks in agriculture, forestry and fisheries. Loss of genetic diversity, like loss of species diversity, is essentially permanent.
Abundant genetic data exists, and can support biodiversity targets. Scientists have assessed genetic diversity in thousands of species over four decades. However, few data sets are ideal for measuring country level progress on genetic Targets, and existing data are strongly biased with notably under-sampled geographic regions, ecosystem realms, and taxa. Still, progress is being made on best practice for genetic monitoring and genetic proxies.
Genetic diversity is eroding from habitat and population loss, direct harvest, disease and increasing extreme events, based on analysis of thousands of datasets.
Genetic diversity is inadequately safeguarded in-situ and ex-situ, with as little as 3% of taxa safeguarded sufficiently. Current ex-situ practices are often insufficient for preserving genetic diversity within species.
Currently used indicators for Target 13 have very little documented correlation to erosion or safeguarding of genetic diversity including animal abundance or plant cover, Red List Index, and number of threatened breeds or varieties. Genetic diversity may erode without change in such indicators (e.g. loss of seaweed genetic diversity with no cover change), and indicators may change without genetic erosion.
  • Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust [Jersey]
  • Leo Foundation [The Netherlands]
  • North of England Zoological Society (Chester Zoo) [United Kingdom]
  • The Royal Zoological Society of Scotland [United Kingdom]
  • Zoos Victoria [Australia]

Hosts